From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F639B8AD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:05:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 85B176088
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:05:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:05:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9D98440C0B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:05:25 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5b15cdca-9203-469a-8a6f-8922db178302@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:05:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20231121090012.23571-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231121090012.23571-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.078 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager] ui: node summary: use SI units
 for HD usage
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:05:26 -0000

Am 21.11.23 um 10:00 schrieb Christian Ebner:
> diff --git a/www/manager6/node/StatusView.js b/www/manager6/node/StatusView.js
> index d34724f7..a6975b6e 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/node/StatusView.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/node/StatusView.js
> @@ -72,7 +72,9 @@ Ext.define('PVE.node.StatusView', {
>  	    title: '/ ' + gettext('HD space'),
>  	    valueField: 'rootfs',
>  	    maxField: 'rootfs',
> -	    renderer: Proxmox.Utils.render_node_size_usage,
> +	    renderer: function(record) {
> +		return Proxmox.Utils.render_size_usage(record.used, record.total, true);
> +	    },

Would it make more sense to change render_node_size_usage directly? Then
PMG and PBS would also get the change. Like this, it will be
inconsistent between the products, or?