From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6680D6C240
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:53:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 524BF15E77
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:53:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DDED015E68
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:53:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A65BC449D6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:53:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5a24e583-10c0-63b6-a159-953f47854d22@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:52:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/93.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210920102302.75130-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210920102302.75130-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [btrfsplugin.pm]
 URI_NOVOWEL               0.5 URI hostname has long non-vowel sequence
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage] btrfs: call free_image
 correctly
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:53:45 -0000

On 20.09.21 12:23, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> Currently, 'PVE::Storage::DirPlugin' is implicitly passed along as
> $class, which means that if the base class's free_image calls another
> method (e.g.  filesystem_path) then the DirPlugin's method will be
> used, rather than the one from BTRFSPlugin. Change it so that $class
> itself is passed along.
> 
> See also commit 279d9de5108f6fc6f2d31f77f1b41d6dc7a67cb9 for context,
> where the approach in this patch was suggested.
> 
> Suggested-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!