From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974689CD74 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:00:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7327220A72 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:00:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:00:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C281B482DB; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:00:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5a05ae07-7002-8e3a-1e11-bd5269d58e4f@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:00:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Eneko Lacunza , Proxmox VE development discussion , "DERUMIER, Alexandre" , "aderumier@odiso.com" References: <20230522102528.186955-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <4d8191f2-4954-1e4f-a40c-51544289b2ce@proxmox.com> <036ad8c33f6af74da89eb8b9c24c1c6cda8fc938.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> <8277a27b-a70f-b731-69f7-fc9ae69b2da2@binovo.es> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <8277a27b-a70f-b731-69f7-fc9ae69b2da2@binovo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.091 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES v3 qemu-server/manager/common] add and set x86-64-v2 as default model for new vms and detect best cpumodel X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 16:00:57 -0000 Am 01.06.23 um 14:02 schrieb Eneko Lacunza: > Hi, > > We have Ryzen 1700, 2600X, 3700 and 5950X machines here, I can test on > them if that helps (please detail tests to perform). > > Thanks > Hi, thank you for the offer. It would be interesting to see if you have any issues with the following: > qm set -args '-cpu kvm64,enforce,+kvm_pv_eoi,+kvm_pv_unhalt,+sep,+lahf_lm,+popcnt,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+ssse3' If you like you can also test > qm set -args '-cpu Nehalem,enforce,+aes,-svm,-vmx,+kvm_pv_eoi,+kvm_pv_unhalt,vendor="GenuineIntel"' After testing use > qm set --delete args to get rid of the modification again. Make sure to stop/start the VM fresh after each modification. As for what to test, installing Debian 11 would be nice just for comparison, but other than that, just do what you like, shouldn't really matter too much :) Best Regards, Fiona