From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3017460872 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:45:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 20F55C269 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:44:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from h01p01.smtp.routit.net (h01p01.smtp.routit.net [89.146.30.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 819B8C255 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:44:45 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: h01p01.smtp.routit.net; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=MHonkoop@comsolve.nl Received-SPF: Pass (h01p01.smtp.routit.net: domain of MHonkoop@comsolve.nl designates 185.106.153.121 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=185.106.153.121; receiver=h01p01.smtp.routit.net; envelope-from="MHonkoop@comsolve.nl"; x-sender="MHonkoop@comsolve.nl"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 +a:mail.comsolve.nl +include:heldenvan.nu -all" IronPort-SDR: j2EmClKgBwh5iUCrhep+dXLf0M4mnP9/CREPeTVeTr8r7QmnM4nIeUkM1hhN6o3muPR8gTEVDf NiaGfvd5BO0A== X-SenderBaseSpam: None Received: from mail.comsolve.nl ([185.106.153.121]) by h01p01.smtp.routit.net with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2020 00:44:45 +0100 Received: from DOM_COMSOLVE-MTA by mail.comsolve.nl with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:44:44 +0100 Message-Id: <5FD7F8EA0200008800004149@mail.comsolve.nl> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.2.2 Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:44:42 +0100 From: "Michael Honkoop" To: References: <5FD56B860200008800004138@mail.comsolve.nl> <5FD56B860200008800004138@mail.comsolve.nl> <1607929849.0i4pachlbl.astroid@nora.none> In-Reply-To: <1607929849.0i4pachlbl.astroid@nora.none> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Feature: OAuth / OpenID-connect implementation - II X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 23:45:16 -0000 Hi all,=20 In watching build-behaviour, i notice that when i build another git repo = (pve-manager) it drops the directory 'dest' and then ( if one deletes the = resulting *buildinfo, *.changes and *.deb) starts rebuilding. On the pve-access-control it does not remove the directory 'libpve-access-c= ontrol-6.1' , so when one has this dir, ( and assuming same behaviour as = seen on pve-manager repo) it will take all sources from this dir - = regardless of changes. Is there a specific reason this differs from the pve-manager repo ? - as = only after analysing why my added file was skipped over and over again ( = in pve-access-control ) has lead me to a lot of questionmarks in my mind. best regards,=20 Michael Honkoop