From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7D4C173; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:33:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AFC3B30765; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:32:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:32:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2D987438C4; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:32:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <59f5469a-0502-c715-4be3-6157f3f5f2fa@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:32:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:108.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/108.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Matthias Heiserer , pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20221007111859.205737-1-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> <20221007111859.205737-3-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20221007111859.205737-3-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.099 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.257 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/2] GUI: CSS: remove redundant action column style X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:33:02 -0000 Am 07/10/2022 um 13:18 schrieb Matthias Heiserer: > Signed-off-by: Matthias Heiserer > --- > > Changes from v1: > remove both action column styles > > www/css/ext6-pbs.css | 14 -------------- > 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/www/css/ext6-pbs.css b/www/css/ext6-pbs.css > index 3c8bed55..7fc60eee 100644 > --- a/www/css/ext6-pbs.css > +++ b/www/css/ext6-pbs.css > @@ -127,20 +127,6 @@ table:not(.x-grid-item-selected) tr.x-grid-row.disabled { > color: #cfcfcf; > } > > -/* fix action column icons */ > -.x-action-col-icon { > - font-size: 13px; > - height: 13px; > -} > - > -.x-grid-cell-inner-action-col { > - padding: 6px 10px 5px; > -} ^- above rule gets lost and bloats up vertical padding quite a bit in the progress, there's no commit message so a bit hard to tell, but just from the subject I'd think that this is meant to be done, or? > - > -.x-action-col-icon:before { > - color: #555; > -} > - > .x-treelist-item-icon { > color: #000; > }