From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA971FF17A for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:12:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A7D41871B; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:12:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <59d16447-5f20-4a38-a7b0-fa4890174440@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:12:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Fiona Ebner To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Friedrich Weber References: <20251024122705.93761-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> <82562115-907d-41d2-b3c1-ee8bbc91d1d8@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1761649927746 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server/storage 0/3] fix #5779: introduce guest hints to pass rxbounce flag to KRBD X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Thomas Lamprecht Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 28.10.25 um 11:50 AM schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Using unmap and then map again might be safe in certain situations like > VM start, where there should be no other active users of the volume > (from the top of my head, but would need to be checked in detail of > course). I think it must be safe, because we do have an explicit deactivate call if VM start fails ;) _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel