From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3954B1FF16B for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 18:28:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9AFE0AC05; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 18:29:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59b49982-bc13-477d-8c00-f9509cd5d9b1@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 18:29:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Lukas Wagner , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20250626160626.311407-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> <79e1d338-d492-483d-87b1-024c52c237c0@proxmox.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <79e1d338-d492-483d-87b1-024c52c237c0@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.013 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 Average reputation (+2) RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container/qemu-server/storage v8 00/10] fix #3711 and adapt drive detach/remove behavior X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 7/8/25 13:09, Lukas Wagner wrote: > Something that I have noticed is that when you have a second disk/mountpoint on > some storage, detach the disk/mountpoint, remove the storage and then > try to remove the unused disk, there is a difference in behavior between > containers and VMs. For VMs, the ununused disk can be removed, while for containers > the removal fails with: > > unused0: unable to apply pending change unused0 : storage 'test' does not exist > Sorry for the late reply and thanks for having a look at this! Good catch. Considering some of the other patches in this series are aimed at streamlining the behavior of VMs and CTs, I'll add a check similar to the one done for VMs in a v9. > > Also did a brief review of the code. I'm not really familiar with these parts > of our stack, but from my point of view these changes look fine. > > > Tested-by: Lukas Wagner > Reviewed-by: Lukas Wagner > > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel