From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E38360A95
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  6 Feb 2021 15:29:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 86156121CE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  6 Feb 2021 15:29:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A52FA121C0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  6 Feb 2021 15:29:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 667F741B6F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  6 Feb 2021 15:29:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <58efd38e-a7c8-d60e-a3be-9ac0e5cc198a@proxmox.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 15:29:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/86.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
References: <20200911100816.80543-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
 <20200911100816.80543-2-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200911100816.80543-2-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.105 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 pve-common 1/5] replace rate with
 out/in-rate in setup_tc_rate_limit and tap_rate_limit
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:29:14 -0000

On 11.09.20 12:08, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/Network.pm | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Network.pm b/src/PVE/Network.pm
> index 12536c7..3e7a1c1 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Network.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Network.pm
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ our $ipv4_mask_hash_localnet = {
>  };
>  
>  sub setup_tc_rate_limit {
> -    my ($iface, $rate, $burst) = @_;
> +    my ($iface, $outrate, $inrate, $burst) = @_;
>  
>      # these are allowed / expected to fail, e.g. when there is no previous rate limit to remove
>      eval { run_command("/sbin/tc class del dev $iface parent 1: classid 1:1 >/dev/null 2>&1"); };
> @@ -90,29 +90,35 @@ sub setup_tc_rate_limit {
>      eval { run_command("/sbin/tc qdisc del dev $iface ingress >/dev/null 2>&1"); };
>      eval { run_command("/sbin/tc qdisc del dev $iface root >/dev/null 2>&1"); };
>  
> -    return if !$rate;
> -
>      # tbf does not work for unknown reason
>      #$TC qdisc add dev $DEV root tbf rate $RATE latency 100ms burst $BURST
>      # so we use htb instead
> -    run_command("/sbin/tc qdisc add dev $iface root handle 1: htb default 1");
> -    run_command("/sbin/tc class add dev $iface parent 1: classid 1:1 " .
> -		"htb rate ${rate}bps burst ${burst}b");
> -
> -    run_command("/sbin/tc qdisc add dev $iface handle ffff: ingress");
> -    run_command("/sbin/tc filter add dev $iface parent ffff: " .
> -		"prio 50 basic " .
> -		"police rate ${rate}bps burst ${burst}b mtu 64kb " .
> -		"drop");
> +
> +    # inrate limits the egress of the tap device (=> inrate of the VM)
> +    if($inrate) {
> +	run_command("/sbin/tc qdisc add dev $iface root handle 1: htb default 1");
> +	run_command("/sbin/tc class add dev $iface parent 1: classid 1:1 " .
> +	    "htb rate ${inrate}bps burst ${burst}b");
> +    }

please transform run_command to array usage in a separate commit, that string
handling was always ugly and may break or result in command injection if it
gets called with a non-checked $iface (e.g., contains whitespaces or, well,
command injections).

> +
> +    # outrate limits the ingress of the tap device (=> outrate of the VM)
> +    if($outrate) {
> +	run_command("/sbin/tc qdisc add dev $iface handle ffff: ingress");
> +	run_command("/sbin/tc filter add dev $iface parent ffff: " .
> +	    "prio 50 basic " .
> +	    "police rate ${outrate}bps burst ${burst}b mtu 64kb " .
> +	    "drop")
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  sub tap_rate_limit {
> -    my ($iface, $rate) = @_;
> +    my ($iface, $outrate, $inrate) = @_;

please keep this backward compatible, i.e., if @_ only gets called with two
elements use it for both, $inrate and $outrate.

>  
> -    $rate = int($rate*1024*1024) if $rate;
> +    $outrate = int($outrate*1024*1024) if $outrate;
> +    $inrate = int($inrate*1024*1024) if $inrate;
>      my $burst = 1024*1024;
>  
> -    setup_tc_rate_limit($iface, $rate, $burst);
> +    setup_tc_rate_limit($iface, $outrate, $inrate, $burst);
>  }
>  
>  sub read_bridge_mtu {
>