From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAA071FF162
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Apr 2025 09:39:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B3ABD37776;
	Mon,  7 Apr 2025 09:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5805dac0-0fb9-4a6a-976e-adec589ea1b5@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 09:39:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20250404094041.153518-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20250404094041.153518-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.037 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] superseded: [PATCH v2 qemu] PVE backup: backup access
 api: simplify bitmap logic
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

For the record, this was re-sent (and later applied) as part of v9 of
the backup provider API series:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250404133204.239783-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com/

Am 04.04.25 um 11:40 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> Currently, only one bitmap name per target is planned to be used.
> Simply use the target ID itself as the bitmap name. This allows to
> simplify the logic quite a bit and there also is no need for the
> backup_access_bitmaps hash table anymore.
> 
> For the return value, the bitmap names are still passed along for
> convenience in the caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel