From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D5D92948 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:35:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3862E1A166 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:35:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:34:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B508F443B9 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:34:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <573bf500-354c-3d74-c224-5251d5c4bbca@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:34:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:108.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/108.0 Content-Language: en-GB, de-AT To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Sterz , Fiona Ebner , Mira Limbeck References: <20221215165700.2061397-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.544 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.149 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] report: filter comments in VM/CT configs X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 14:35:30 -0000 Am 28/12/2022 um 15:18 schrieb Stefan Sterz: > maybe somewhat off-topic for the patch at hand, but it might be nice to > modularize the pve report. so that `pvereport` gives you a default set > of information, but you could also use `pvereport ha` to give you more > information specifically about the state of the ha manager or `pvereport > ceph` for information about ceph etc. > > maybe paired with a verbose flag so that you could request more detailed > info. e.g. `pvereport zfs` gives the zfs information currently in the > report, but `pvereport zfs -v` could also include `arc_summary` and `cat > /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_max` and other less often needed but > sometimes useful information. > > this might be handy especially in cases where you need information that > spans several files/commands that aren't always needed. it might make > the `pvereport` more useful in the forum too, where we currently can't > use it at all because it discloses too much information. > I'd rather keep it simple and not blow it up too much with a massive amount of switches, lots of topics are very intertwined, e.g., ha issues often need most information to have a full picture, i.e., it never hurts to have more information. Also note that the forum is the community one and so IMO the wrong place for any generic enterprise support report request, publicly readable for all compared to the subscription contract and private enterprise support portal. If, a generic (public) IP hashing might be sensible, and if that's done such that it's still relatively easy to trace the different used one (i.e., a more human readable/comparable hash than md5/SHA/...) it can be just always turned on too.