From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3583160DE0
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Sep 2020 18:33:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2663C1ADFF
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Sep 2020 18:32:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 13D721ADF0
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Sep 2020 18:32:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D0DD3449F0
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu,  3 Sep 2020 18:32:40 +0200 (CEST)
To: PVE development discussion <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20200625115933.20108-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20200625115933.20108-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <55f1f70a-c676-98ba-c98f-7cb64876b605@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:32:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/81.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200625115933.20108-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.038 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.324 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/1] ui: use ZFS components and
 functions from widget-toolkit
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:33:12 -0000

On 25.06.20 13:59, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> render_zfs_health is now in widget-toolkit
> as well as the 'MultiDiskSelector' and the Detailwindow
> 
> and drop the now unnecessary classes
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/manager6/Utils.js    |  26 ----
>  www/manager6/node/ZFS.js | 255 +--------------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 275 deletions(-)
> 

seems that Utils conflicts now, can you please check why (not that we added here
something which is missing in the wtk variant), rebase and do a d/control dependency
version bump along side? Thanks!