From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF331FF15C for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:49:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 500CB11EB3; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:49:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54fb42d0-8641-4c42-9abf-28a9c1f70509@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:48:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Alexandre Derumier References: <20231219083216.2551645-1-aderumier@odiso.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Stefan Hanreich In-Reply-To: <20231219083216.2551645-1-aderumier@odiso.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.659 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 0/7] add dhcp support for all zones X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Currently trying to rebase this onto current pve-network, but there are some clashes with the MTU series (or rather, I need to implement MTU for the other zones as well now). On 12/19/23 09:32, Alexandre Derumier wrote: > TO FIX: > > - Dnsmasq is currently buggy with ipv6 && vrf (no crash but it's not listening), and need to be patched with: > https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=a889c554a7df71ff93a8299ef96037fbe05f2f55 > I have tested it, just applying this patch on current debian source is enough to get is working. > > > - for layer2 network, we can't use a /128 for ipv6 like the /32 of ipv4. > ipv6 range is large, so it shouldn't be a problem for user to have a free ip. (I can be the same on all vnets). > But that mean we can't reuse the gateway ip (or it'll conflict). > We need to be able to define a different ipv6 for dnsmasq server here. (and make it mandatory for ipv6 in this plugins) Reading through this again: Wouldn't it make sense to use the link-local address then? Or is there something I'm missing? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel