From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E186392B7B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:57:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D1FA129E53
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:57:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:57:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3B38B43F31
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:57:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5444350f-f818-88a2-5f42-34aa68ebbf79@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:57:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:105.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/105.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20220914080554.2113739-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220914080554.2113739-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.008 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 manager] postinst: migrate/update
 APT auth config
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:57:32 -0000

Am 14/09/2022 um 10:05 schrieb Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler:
> missed when switching over to Proxmox::RS::Subscription, which stores
> the same info in the product-specific /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/pve.conf .
>=20
> the top-level file might contain non-PVE-managed entries, so only remov=
e
> entries matching "our" machine.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> ---
>=20
> Notes:
>     v2:
>     - actually use final version of migrate_apt_auth_conf
>     - read -r
>=20
>  debian/postinst | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>=20
>

applied, thanks! fyi, similar to PMG I also transformed that file to four=
 spaces only
indentation in a followup, plus an extra patch adding an early return to =
set_lvm_conf,
avoiding an extra indent level for most of the function body.