From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <f.schauer@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FBFE98A5C for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E64F218AFA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1C034493E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <512b8980-9631-05a1-1a7e-ff18fa13e03e@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20230825121851.103307-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com> From: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20230825121851.103307-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.848 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.818 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server 0/2] Fix ACPI-suspended VMs resuming after migration X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 13:27:46 -0000 v3 patch available: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2023-October/059387.html On 25/08/2023 14:18, Filip Schauer wrote: > Shutdown and reboot commands do infact time out instead of failing > immediately on suspended VMs. This is fixed by extending vm_is_paused > with the "suspended" runstate. It also make sense to check for the > "prelaunch" runstate, as the VM is not running in that state. To > accommodate the changes, the function is renamed to vm_is_frozen. > > Filip Schauer (2): > Add missing checks for paused runstates > Rename vm_is_paused to vm_is_frozen > > PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 8 ++++---- > PVE/QemuMigrate.pm | 8 ++++---- > PVE/QemuServer.pm | 8 ++++++-- > PVE/VZDump/QemuServer.pm | 14 +++++++------- > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >