From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6219B1FF15F for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:52:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE793A7C8; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:52:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5126c251-64fd-44fe-b1a6-fda9074eb9a1@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:52:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20241111135436.82773-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <1ba68b4a-58ab-4376-b80f-0f877d856c9d@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <1ba68b4a-58ab-4376-b80f-0f877d856c9d@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.054 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] partially-applied: [PATCH-SERIES v4 docs/qemu-server] more robust handling of fleecing images X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 17.11.24 um 19:43 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > Am 11.11.24 um 14:54 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> qemu-server: >> >> Fiona Ebner (7): >> backup: prepare: factor out getting running status >> backup: prepare: cancel previous job if still running >> parse config: allow config keys with minus sign >> schema: add fleecing-images config property > > applied above four, thanks! Below needs to be rebased due to the commit > moving around cleanup of fleecign that was applied by Fabian a few days > ago. > Regarding the patch "schema: add fleecing-images config property", Fabian off-list suggested using a config section "special:fleecing" instead of a property, so that it is truly internal-only. If we go for that, the commit should be reverted. Which approach do you prefer? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel