From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8C8B1FF15F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:22:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 95DAEB225;
	Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:22:55 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5120d3d1-4cab-4505-a13b-9ec4aebbebc9@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:22:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20241115120937.169342-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
 <20241115120937.169342-5-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
 <067c607a-d1da-4abb-b699-6e2a26ff68cd@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <067c607a-d1da-4abb-b699-6e2a26ff68cd@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.658 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-firewall v4 4/9] add support for loading
 sdn firewall configuration
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 11/17/24 15:57, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/Service/pve_firewall.pm b/src/PVE/Service/pve_firewall.pm
>> index 65cb2b8..02b507a 100755
>> --- a/src/PVE/Service/pve_firewall.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/Service/pve_firewall.pm
>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>>  
>>  	    PVE::Firewall::set_verbose(1); # show syntax errors
>>  
>> -	    my $cluster_conf = PVE::Firewall::load_clusterfw_conf(undef);
>> +	    my $cluster_conf = PVE::Firewall::load_clusterfw_conf();
> 
> just to be sure, above and below does not change anything, or?

yes. if the first parameter (= filename) is undef, then it loads the
config from the default path.

I'll look into incorporating the rest of your suggestions - thanks!


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel