From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FF072976
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  2 Jul 2021 15:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3029E9E52
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  2 Jul 2021 15:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BF55E9DF1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  2 Jul 2021 15:28:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 974A94043D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  2 Jul 2021 15:28:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5105a815-95d7-fe8b-f922-b3753f1235a6@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 15:28:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210701122506.503289-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20210701122506.503289-8-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210701122506.503289-8-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.545 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager 6/6] ui: Workspace: use domains
 info to hide password/tfa items
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 13:28:38 -0000

On 01.07.21 14:25, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> in the user menu
> 
> we have to make an additional api call here, since it is the only
> place (currently) where we can get the realm type
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> alternatively, we could give that info in the index or the ticket
> api call, but this has the advantage that we will load the
> domains and can add them to the acl list (not included in this
> series, would send that when this gets applied)
> 
>  www/manager6/Workspace.js | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied, with the adaption for moving `parse_userid` to widget-toolkit squashed
into it, thanks!