From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9F7DBAE11 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:48:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A1782324E5 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:48:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:48:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D87C8415A0 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:48:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50ee3ebd-6b48-44ee-ba02-f98ef6ea4609@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:48:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Sterz References: <20240321155044.190520-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> From: Aaron Lauterer In-Reply-To: <20240321155044.190520-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.059 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH docs 1/2] qm: multiqueue specify that it needs to be vCPUs not cores X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:48:04 -0000 On 2024-03-21 16:50, Stefan Sterz wrote: > total number of cores != vCPUs if there is more than one socket > configured. according to the redhat docs it should be vCPUs not cores: > >> Multi-queue virtio-net provides the greatest performance benefit when: >> [..] >> - The number of queues is equal to the number of vCPUs. > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/virtualization_tuning_and_optimization_guide/sect-virtualization_tuning_optimization_guide-networking-techniques#sect-Virtualization_Tuning_Optimization_Guide-Networking-Multi-queue_virtio-net > Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz > --- > qm.adoc | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > applied series with a small follow up linking to our VirtIO wiki page instead of directly to the latest ISO thanks!