From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7799A19A for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CCF391E70A for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 801374513A for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4fcf3158-539d-2d88-a514-8ae6a0c271b6@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20230515133956.112292-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <7e34ee84-00fc-5a2e-1056-e7e848930a6e@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <7e34ee84-00fc-5a2e-1056-e7e848930a6e@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.609 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -3.811 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES v2 qemu] update to QEMU 8.0 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 14:04:24 -0000 Am 15.05.23 um 15:51 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > I should also mention that I ran into a migration issue today where a > guest crashed (inside the VM, QEMU itself seemed fine), because of I/O. > Might be related to PBS backup, local disks and/or snapshots. Will need > to debug and see if I can reproduce it. So please don't test it with > production machines yet ;) > Well, the disk of my VM was actually full. But the VM was stuck with "Guest has not initialized the display (yet)", which is the strange part. Maybe that can happen if the guest is migrated while hanging/crashed. Even with trying quite a bit today, I haven't been able to reproduce the issue a second time, so maybe it really was just that.