From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A931FF140 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 02:12:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 81E3F1F6B7; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 02:13:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4fb7df53-22cd-4bd5-a586-3b8a7a3ed32c@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 02:12:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-server v2 1/4] agent: add should_fs_freeze helper To: Fiona Ebner , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260325213415.3861690-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> <20260325213415.3861690-2-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> <16fb9fa8-a0a3-4ccb-ab8c-800c23ac2334@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <16fb9fa8-a0a3-4ccb-ab8c-800c23ac2334@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1774573910690 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: NHS27JJKGSDWIZOM42USNEWZY2C4QIKJ X-Message-ID-Hash: NHS27JJKGSDWIZOM42USNEWZY2C4QIKJ X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 26.03.26 um 13:54 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > I feel like we should either rename the existing guest_fs{freeze,thaw}() > functions or this one for consistency ('fs_freeze' versus 'fsfreeze'). Agree, that would be nicer to read too besides consistency.