From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B2088A335 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:29:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 20F7435801 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:29:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:29:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C79C742CE7 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:29:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4efb04ae-0c60-7e66-2714-12ee7494c212@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:29:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Stefan Hrdlicka , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20220719115707.4006326-1-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com> <20220719115707.4006326-2-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com> <1b8b07f3-b25d-8a88-3177-a060bc34af39@proxmox.com> <6ba2ac6a-8c65-fc13-aa8f-c78e02e1042c@proxmox.com> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <6ba2ac6a-8c65-fc13-aa8f-c78e02e1042c@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.041 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH V3 pve-manager 1/2] fix #2822: add lvm, lvmthin & zfs storage for all cluster nodes X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:29:29 -0000 Am 01.08.22 um 16:30 schrieb Stefan Hrdlicka: > Hello :) > > On 7/27/22 12:19, Fiona Ebner wrote: >> Am 19.07.22 um 13:57 schrieb Stefan Hrdlicka: >>> @@ -42,7 +45,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.storage.IScsiScan', { >>>           fields: ['target', 'portal'], >>>           proxy: { >>>           type: 'proxmox', >>> -        url: `/api2/json/nodes/${me.nodename}/scan/iscsi`, >>> +        url: me.apiBaseUrl + me.nodename + me.apiStoragePath, >> >> Style nit: please keep using template string syntax >> Same for the other ones below > > Exactly this one: >     url: `/api2/json/nodes/${me.nodename}/scan/iscsi` or do you mean or > would something like this be ok as well: >     url: `${me.apiBaseUrl}${me.nodename}${me.apiSuffix}` > The second one please ;) The change itself is fine, but the template string style is preferred. In this case, it's not that big of a deal, but when mixing with actual string literals, it's just nicer to read. And in other rare cases it can prevent accidental numerical addition.