From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81F4E8DF80;
 Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:11:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6211325CAA;
 Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:11:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS;
 Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:11:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 99E65444AF;
 Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:11:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4c5d5d99-03a7-5206-7bff-010f7e860e6e@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:11:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/107.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20221021130252.176316-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20221021130252.176316-10-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221021130252.176316-10-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 4/4] d/control: drop
 ${shlibs:Depends} for pve-manager
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:11:31 -0000

Am 21/10/2022 um 15:02 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> Now that the pvemailforward binary was dropped, there is a lintian
> warning that it's not defined anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  debian/control | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index 251bdf77..35c9eee3 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ Depends: apt-transport-https | apt (>= 1.5~),
>           wget,
>           ${misc:Depends},
>           ${perl:Depends},
> -         ${shlibs:Depends},
>  Recommends: proxmox-offline-mirror-helper
>  Suggests: libpve-network-perl (>= 0.5-1)
>  Conflicts: vlan,

we can now probably also move this from an `Architecture: any` to an `Architecture: all`
package, not high priority but it would make cross-building community projects a bit
simpler.