From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5BB70D27 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:30:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 679F720E27 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:30:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BADC720E19 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:30:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 939BA42875 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:30:50 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20210604134946.152720-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <20210604134946.152720-9-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <1623157330.74f1vq87w2.astroid@nora.none> <0e8ce187-b68e-8b1b-b388-9b8277306c0c@proxmox.com> From: Fabian Ebner Message-ID: <4ba0c126-20cd-b638-5ae3-706b3c0d5c17@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:30:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0e8ce187-b68e-8b1b-b388-9b8277306c0c@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.953 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 2/3] update reminder to remove maxfiles X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:30:52 -0000 Am 08.06.21 um 18:23 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > On 08.06.21 15:04, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: >> On June 4, 2021 3:49 pm, Fabian Ebner wrote: >>> Remove it later, once it's been deprecated for a while. >> >> shouldn't we start warning that it is deprecated? or at least add a >> deprecation notice to the parameter description? >> > > that can be done in 8.0 or so, it's a really cheap translation which has > zero cost to do > Warning about it now might be a bit noisy. The parameter is auto-converted on read, so once we are at 8.0, it might be gone from many setups already. But sure, mentioning the deprecation status in the parameter description should be done (not only in the vzdump schema...). Will send it in a followup or v2. > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >