From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2807EF98F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:25:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 005D2B4E4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:25:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:25:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 84E2843A6C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:25:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4aefac1e-339c-0679-6fd8-7f3a91071a91@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:25:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-AT, en-US
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20230721093910.254158-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
 <313fdf75-38dd-492d-8588-77fa445a7415@proxmox.com>
From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <313fdf75-38dd-492d-8588-77fa445a7415@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.066 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] headerbar: use same height and
 padding for product name as PBS and PMG
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:25:19 -0000

On 7/21/23 16:04, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> well we could also meed in the middle, if having 32, 34 or 36 px is
> enough to make it "less cramped"? 
Yeah, the main reason for 38px was the consistency to other products.

Now that I play around a bit with different heights, I feel like the
major visual improvement (I know, this is subjective) comes from
the added horizontal padding between the logo and the product name (5px),
as well as the centered search. I'd be happy to settle on 30px it that
makes it any easier to sell the centered, larger search box. ;)


-- 
- Lukas