From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BB3C1FF17C
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 May 2025 12:07:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0B50631942;
Wed, 28 May 2025 12:07:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4a5ebe14-11ed-488f-9bb4-94daf6a3f147@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:07:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
"f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20250422115141.808427-1-alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>
<mailman.23.1745322744.394.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
<893680352.12923.1746786612624@webmail.proxmox.com>
<mailman.75.1748423375.395.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.75.1748423375.395.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [asdf.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 13/14] blockdev: add
backing_chain support
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Am 28.05.25 um 11:08 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre via pve-devel:
> perl question: how to call a resursive private sub ? (it don't seem to
> allow it)
AFAIK, you can do it by declaring it up-front:
> [I] root@pve8a1 ~# cat asdf.pm
> use strict;
> use warnings;
>
> package Private;
>
> my sub addpriv;
> sub addpriv {
> my ($n, $m) = @_;
> return $n if $m == 0;
> addpriv($n + 1, $m - 1);
> }
>
> 1;
>
> package Public;
>
> sub addpub {
> my ($n, $m) = @_;
> return $n if $m == 0;
> addpub($n + 1, $m - 1);
> }
>
> 1;
>
> package Tester;
>
> print Public::addpub(2,3) . "\n";
> print Private::addpriv(2,3) . "\n";
>
> 1;
> [I] root@pve8a1 ~# perl asdf.pm
> 5
> Undefined subroutine &Private::addpriv called at asdf.pm line 28.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel