From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08E32F326 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:02:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE05116773 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:02:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:02:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1D2DA41E51 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:02:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <47fc5267-0fcc-33c4-f3f3-f98936d37436@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:02:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Maximiliano Sandoval , Fiona Ebner , Lukas Wagner , Dominik Csapak References: <20230717150051.710464-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20230717150051.710464-60-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <6aa1cefb-26a4-4950-8e24-b43e6cc05854@proxmox.com> <058b0082-e2da-18cc-1da0-ac229f38c031@proxmox.com> <1219657346.183.1689845218622@webmail.proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <1219657346.183.1689845218622@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.076 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 pve-manager 59/66] ui: perm path: load notification target/filter acl entries X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:02:32 -0000 On 20/07/2023 11:26, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote: >> On 20.07.2023 10:29 CEST Fiona Ebner wrote: >> Am 20.07.23 um 10:22 schrieb Lukas Wagner: >>> Aaaah true, I didn't realize that. These non-obvious editable combo boxes >>> have bugged me for a while now. Maybe I'll look into it to see if there >>> is a way to make >>> these a bit more obvious to use. IIRC, our schedule pickers have >>> '(editable)' in the empty text, Yeah I did that and am not really happy with it, and we had at least some users that were still confused, we naturally have no numbers of people where this empty-text alone was enough to understand it clearly, so hard to say what the net benefit of it was. >>> but that feels more like a workaround rather than an actual solution to >>> that issue. >>> >> >> Maybe some kind of pencil icon on the side within the field? With an >> "Edit" tooltip, selecting the text when clicking it? Just an idea that >> came to mind, not sure if it's any good. >> For editable dropdowns I'd might be better option to have a extra entry in the selector, like "custom" or "manual",maybe even with the pencil icon to distinguish it from the actual choices. If selected it can simply set the text to '' and focus the field (i.e., just give it a value of ''). ps. can we *please* avoid top-posting, rather use interleaved posting (or at least bottom) also trim the context of replies to what matters (applies not only to you in this thread)