From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0959524A for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:07:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4FA4B478D for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:07:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:07:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8574E44CEA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:07:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <476132aa-8ab5-4c8d-b4c8-0a0e4eab326d@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:07:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20230912122954.156735-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <b40f2b63-5d28-439a-b094-ceae29e0ffb0@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <b40f2b63-5d28-439a-b094-ceae29e0ffb0@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 pve-zsync] parse disks: improve error messages X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:07:35 -0000 Am 11.04.24 um 21:04 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > On 12/09/2023 14:29, Fiona Ebner wrote: >> The one with the backup flag was reported in the community forum: >> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/77254/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: >> * Further improve message as suggested by Sterzy. >> >> pve-zsync | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> > > applied, thanks! > > should this immediately bumped or is there some other patches, existing > or short-term planned? Just not that we forget this for too long now > (FWIW, feel free to do the bump yourself if you want). I'm not aware of any outstanding patches. Okay, I'll go ahead and bump it.