From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6424B6153F
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 06:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 561CF298D0
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 06:22:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 14D67298B2
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 06:22:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DA01F4347D
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 06:22:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 06:21:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: dietmar <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@odiso.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 pve-devel <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <469910091.758.1599366116137@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1710924670.385348.1599327014568.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
References: <216436814.339545.1599142316781.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <1044807310.366666.1599222580644.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <481953113.753.1599234165778@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <1667839988.383835.1599312761359.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <665305060.757.1599319409105@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <1710924670.385348.1599327014568.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev21
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.099 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] corosync bug: cluster break after 1 node clean
 shutdown
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 04:23:10 -0000

> >>So you are using ipmi hardware watchdog?
> 
> yes, I'm using dell idrac ipmi card watchdog

But the pve logs look ok, and there is no indication
that we stopped updating the watchdog. So why did the
watchdog trigger? Maybe an IPMI bug?