From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8217610C0 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:50:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A2C821F9C8 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:49:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com (mail-wm1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9E8AF1F9BE for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:49:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id c198so5806595wmd.0 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:49:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=BxlH6bEjrMmkCRbBIQPaJh/IZCrxyyoRkoCzJfE2Mo4=; b=rCvYD/4A3PcqIUlT3+5M9NL/u0vBzj/8CTm5xoQButysS0mV1LbeH2C6Zy29JCD7+J 7wL6p8FZ6xJ3jS7o9mJgdjLaWfe0PuvlEMOS96N9r0x4kZ2iF7yhGKEcTuXA9T0kJgPh B8deqTJ3cqcd9WPT4BRQidnm7cjRAjMbI1exyLCm6B8yh8SpB5zDHqMz/75C7B7Teg8m HRwxvyPnEFBtw1F5hE9XtM2qEoh1Z2VwN+jKqS0jc5Z3uY7SBrzDPUtpX8lEbanCOtgM gpjq9lGvB9pveRa0oQcIk0Wo60wDDsbCHZdeQ7LR6J+AM6K5Hs8NRWg7HjvPusJXXzZD 0uzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=BxlH6bEjrMmkCRbBIQPaJh/IZCrxyyoRkoCzJfE2Mo4=; b=m3I3MUfqjNrp/xYxmm4rdu/qrXJ+F8oPjudOObjg99BCybuAduWvaXHrpRxg3Pd0fb y5WCInYXgUEtKy4Q91PgZpJ7LkWQXNFwA7kKfQBim+W2X1fgF+/ns2ftQYwSK1JOi3hf 5S12NKO4f6QZzMsIfFDA8iCmoLGsi3f75uj52PC3D0oApSzyV6G8FNT5t1leFUIjJUnt URIvUhKpWv5MjfTkV1cS2Pr9xDIycNN3IBkEQ3fDhRBJSzjN+Cy0Nr+MZ/XL+Uz0xH80 uecchPImB/OVl2o9uWqv7Im92w2mxOCpm+mFez5bLhuXpjtK8lNFr2/ItglXHUjTpOTr ghNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533nmPkL9kifLriPX4qcEr/gKSGQ70CeA+6IA2ZHLfr8jtrdQs97 xdRAME9WWyvKvNHQiZkI1H2iWUtcntGFcYibZZM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFQDq9ch+aphF2NIImG3wN2WXoxSHPh0wXlG2ZJ468h89RTGzO0Rcbzi1pk+iy5JgFt7DRcg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c8c5:: with SMTP id f5mr10406518wml.174.1606499365811; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([79.132.236.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r21sm16416298wrc.16.2020.11.27.09.49.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20201126091846.371842-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <779023da-3bc7-9fa6-bf1e-79ececc5e6dd@proxmox.com> From: alexandre derumier Message-ID: <45e6ac81-6f22-112a-626e-ef83c28971ff@odiso.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:49:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <779023da-3bc7-9fa6-bf1e-79ececc5e6dd@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.250 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-common] Inotify: delete vlan-id for "iface.X" vlan iface. X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:50:04 -0000 On 27/11/2020 15:33, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > we probably also want to hide the "Vlan raw device" and "VLAN Tag" field in the > web interface for such interfaces (and unify the VLAN casing while we're at ^^) > yes, indeed. we have 3 differents cases: ethx.y       (no option) vlanY        (vlan-raw-device) randomname   (vlan-raw-device + vlan-id, ifupdown2 only)