From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7658473A6C
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:11:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 636402DDAB
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:11:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1582D2DD8D
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:11:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A585740EA9
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:11:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <42fc9647-e5f9-a3da-6ec4-92b1b8a1cc28@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:10:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Victor Hooi <victorhooi@yahoo.com>,
 PVE development discussion <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>
References: <CAMnnoUK8KCAANZfav37or8t0f-hBRi2w32QVsb1n4V=siMnE8g.ref@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMnnoUK8KCAANZfav37or8t0f-hBRi2w32QVsb1n4V=siMnE8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMnnoUK8KCAANZfav37or8t0f-hBRi2w32QVsb1n4V=siMnE8g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.506 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Proxmox 7.0 beta to 7.0-8 - Now unable to start VM
 - cgroup isn't numeric?
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 10:11:18 -0000

Hi,

On 07.07.21 11:44, Victor Hooi wrote:
> I recently upgraded from the Proxmox 7.0 beta, to the latest 7.0-8 release.
> 
> However, when I try to start a Windows VM that I created before, I now get
> the following error:
> 
> Argument "cgroup v1: 1024, cgroup v2: 100" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=)
>> at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/QemuServer.pm line 5312.
>> TASK ERROR: start failed: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.InvalidArgs: Value
>> specified in CPUWeight is out of range
> 
> 
> Did something change between the beta and the release? Is there any way to
> fix the above?

A qemu-server version with a regression made it to the pvetest repository just
a bit ago, fixed now with qemu-server 7.0-9 that super seeded it.