From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0422EBAF40
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:26:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D7C131A4B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:26:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:26:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1B5D2418C5;
 Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:26:24 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3e5f2ec0-4bda-44bd-8e27-97914518dbdb@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:26:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>,
 "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <42b85ceb417a474cccda2ee0b92e4f38a78945a9.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <42b85ceb417a474cccda2ee0b92e4f38a78945a9.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.059 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] release a new pve-network package ? (evpn fix)
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:26:26 -0000

Hi!

On 21/03/2024 09:13, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote:
> a critical bug in evpn with multiple nodes is fixed in git,
> https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-network.git;a=commit;h=e614da43f13e3c61f9b78ee9984364495eff91b6
>  but package is still not released
> 
> I see a lot of user bug report since 4 months  about this, like this
> recent one:
> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/evpn-sdn-issues-after-upgrade-proxmox-ve-from-7-to-8.131236/post-645618
> 
> 
> could it be possible to release à 0.9.6 version?

Yes, just uploaded a new version to pvetest – sorry for the wait.