From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <l.wagner@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7437A939F4 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:38:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 42237A418 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:38:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:38:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 631C643CB7 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:38:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3e2c63bf-2942-46f7-892e-dd4cac422a80@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:38:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20240216091608.60317-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20240216091608.60317-5-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <a3a67121-4485-42a4-9c86-933f01aeb94a@proxmox.com> Content-Language: de-AT, en-US From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <a3a67121-4485-42a4-9c86-933f01aeb94a@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 04/19] ui: dc: backup: show 'Job ID' column X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:38:49 -0000 On 2/20/24 16:23, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > I prefer just showing the ID in the advanced section of the General tab > inside the edit window instead, like your next patch does. > > As I'd slightly prefer to avoid showing those rather unwieldy IDs for a > feature that's often setup only once, especially as a user cannot even > copy+paste easily from the grid. > User can still enable this column themselves, if more often used (albeit > yes, the header options are currently not as easily discoverable as they > could be) Alright, I'll drop the patch if the need for a v4 arises - otherwise this one can just be skipped when applying. -- - Lukas