From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3328F62F34
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Feb 2021 16:26:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2918E249BB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Feb 2021 16:26:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B6F6E249B1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Feb 2021 16:26:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7B9AB45585
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Feb 2021 16:26:06 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3e2870df-22e7-5fe2-d0f5-681e52ad8741@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:26:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/86.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210208142603.24149-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210208142603.24149-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.061 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu-server] test: migrate: correctly
 mock storage module
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:26:07 -0000

On 08.02.21 15:26, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> by fixing a typo. Since cfs_read_file within the storage module was not=
 mocked,
> the tests could fail on some setups. Now that get_bandwidth_limit is mo=
cked,
> cfs_read_file is not called anymore, but still mock it too for good mea=
sure and
> to make it more future-proof.
>=20
> Reported-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  test/MigrationTest/Shared.pm | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>=20
>

applied, thanks!