From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12CA11FF168
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:25:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 86D701E6C9;
Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:25:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3d4e2386-2ba5-4460-9eef-13a80da695cf@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:24:26 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
References: <20250220151401.16555-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250220151401.16555-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.669 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-firewall 1/2] fix: firewall: apply
`nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` to all chains
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
default-in is also checking for conntrack status, so we should put this
there as well. Other than that consider this:
Tested-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
On 2/20/25 16:14, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> ... on the guest table. There is no reason to not repect that option
> on those two chains. These two were missed in the referenced commit.
>
> Fixes: 64dc344b ("firewall: apply `nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` option to guest table")
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> index 2dd7c48..30f7b4f 100644
> --- a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> +++ b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
> }
>
> chain pre-vm-out {
> - meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
> + meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : jump invalid-conntrack }
> }
>
> chain vm-out {
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
>
> chain before-bridge {
> meta protocol arp accept
> - meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
> + meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : jump invalid-conntrack }
> }
>
> chain forward {
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel