From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3A661515
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:21:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7A9BB1CB86
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:21:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:21:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CFE4F4484B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:21:56 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3cb48274-7023-41ed-895d-4cb03ac34924@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:21:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20230725110003.3728126-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230725110003.3728126-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.076 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 docs] pvecm: add qdevice status flag
 explanation
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:21:57 -0000

On 25/07/2023 13:00, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> They are underdocumented and finding information is not that easy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> changes:
> * added reference anchor for easier linking
> * use link to manpages.debian.org instead of github
> 
> 
> the corosync-doc package does ship HTML documentation, but no man pages,
>     therefore only the link
> 
>  pvecm.adoc | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied but split the overly long footnote line (only xref ones need
to be a single line due to our limited parser, but footnotes aren't
looked for by it so there it doesn't matter), thanks!