From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61CEBA9DF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Sep 2023 11:27:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 445CFF8AB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Sep 2023 11:27:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Sep 2023 11:27:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 71EF643518
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Sep 2023 11:27:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3b7bbd79-3b48-beb5-e43c-bf4509e81d04@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 11:27:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.15.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
References: <20230908084907.24417-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230908084907.24417-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.080 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu] Fix spelling error in function
 name
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:27:53 -0000

Am 08.09.23 um 10:49 schrieb Filip Schauer:
> Signed-off-by: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
> ---

applied, thanks!

> diff --git a/debian/patches/pve/0030-PVE-Backup-Proxmox-backup-patches-for-QEMU.patch b/debian/patches/pve/0030-PVE-Backup-Proxmox-backup-patches-for-QEMU.patch
> index d873601..717845c 100644
> --- a/debian/patches/pve/0030-PVE-Backup-Proxmox-backup-patches-for-QEMU.patch
> +++ b/debian/patches/pve/0030-PVE-Backup-Proxmox-backup-patches-for-QEMU.patch
> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ index 0000000000..8cbf645b2c
>  +#endif /* PROXMOX_BACKUP_CLIENT_H */
>  diff --git a/pve-backup.c b/pve-backup.c
>  new file mode 100644
> -index 0000000000..10ca8a0b1d
> +index 0000000000..7ea65125df
>  --- /dev/null
>  +++ b/pve-backup.c
>  @@ -0,0 +1,1109 @@

But I had to fix up index and line context here, because it wasn't based
on latest master.