From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BC8EB184
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:20:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 39D9525B5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:20:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2E7BD25A1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:20:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 07FF442FA5;
 Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:20:23 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3afb2f41-3644-341c-8ef3-64914e6adf93@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:20:22 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/100.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20220428115809.1661165-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <20220428115809.1661165-4-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220428115809.1661165-4-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.052 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.857 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [tools.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 3/5] ceph tools: add function to get
 pool properties
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:20:24 -0000

same here with the PVE::RADOS object (also in the next patch)

On 4/28/22 13:58, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> ---
>   PVE/Ceph/Tools.pm | 13 +++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/Ceph/Tools.pm b/PVE/Ceph/Tools.pm
> index 0c75df0e..b5e60783 100644
> --- a/PVE/Ceph/Tools.pm
> +++ b/PVE/Ceph/Tools.pm
> @@ -255,6 +255,19 @@ sub set_pool {
>   
>   }
>   
> +sub get_pool_properties {
> +    my ($pool) = @_;
> +    my $command = {
> +	prefix => "osd pool get",
> +	pool   => "$pool",
> +	var    => "all",
> +	format => 'json',
> +    };
> +
> +    my $rados = PVE::RADOS->new();
> +    return $rados->mon_command($command);
> +}
> +
>   sub create_pool {
>       my ($pool, $param, $rados) = @_;
>