From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49188626E3 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:22:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3F3AD197D3 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:22:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 40D2D197C6 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:22:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 06F2045992; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:22:14 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Gilberto Nunes References: From: Aaron Lauterer Message-ID: <39ec0356-5003-4996-07e6-09c02127bd6d@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:22:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.008 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Qm move_disk bug (?) X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:22:15 -0000 Hey, How did you move the disk? GUI or CLI? If via CLI, could you post the command? Additionally, which versions are installed? (pveversion -v) One more question inline. On 9/30/20 3:16 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Hi all > > I tried to move a vm disk from LVM-thin to a Directory Storage but when I > did this, the qm move_disk just filled up the entire disk. The VM disk (100G) or the physical disk of of the storage? > The disk inside LVM-thin has 100G in size but only about 5G is occupied by > the OS. > I have used the qcow2 format. > However, if I do it from CLI with the command: > > qemu-img convert -O qcow2 /dev/pve/vm-100-disk-0 > /DATA/images/100/vm-100-disk-0.qcow2 > > It works nicely and just copied what the OS occupied inside the VM, but > created a virtual disk with 100GB. > > It's some kind of bug with qm move_disk??? > > Thanks a lot > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > >