From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27F0A94E1E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:35:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10BB91824 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:35:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:35:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B6D54524C for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:35:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <37c40bca-9ca5-086a-6392-4501b679be99@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:35:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/109.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20221223095915.3035857-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20221223095915.3035857-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.038 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH manager v2 0/2] Ceph API update return schemas X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:35:09 -0000 Am 23/12/2022 um 10:59 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: > by adding more precise return definitions. > > Patch 3/3 from the last version [0] is split into two patches. > > The first handles a few small updates while the second one is a bit > larger, adding more infos for the cluster/ceph/metadata return schemas. > > > > [0] https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2022-December/055268.html > > Aaron Lauterer (2): > api: ceph: update return schemas > api: ceph: metadata: update return schema > > PVE/API2/Ceph.pm | 7 +- > PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm | 11 ++- > PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm | 10 +++ > PVE/API2/Cluster/Ceph.pm | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > applied both patches, thanks!