From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D693F833B8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  3 Dec 2021 08:49:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C587621972
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  3 Dec 2021 08:49:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8959F21965
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  3 Dec 2021 08:49:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5ED04446F5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  3 Dec 2021 08:49:13 +0100 (CET)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>,
 pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20211111140721.3288364-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <7a0968df-559b-81de-1df1-f912866b39d5@proxmox.com>
 <1638457827.k2t0muctq1.astroid@nora.none>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <367fe571-f35f-5080-eccd-b4a435d5e762@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:49:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1638457827.k2t0muctq1.astroid@nora.none>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.812 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A             -3.3 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server++ 0/15] remote migration
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 07:49:44 -0000

Am 02.12.21 um 16:36 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
> On November 30, 2021 3:06 pm, Fabian Ebner wrote:
>> Am 11.11.21 um 15:07 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
>> For the 'config' command, 'Sys.Modify' seems to be required
>>       failed to handle 'config' command - 403 Permission check failed (/,
>> Sys.Modify)
> 
> did you maybe have 'startup' set in the VM config? that requires
> Sys.Modify on / to change, and we pass the full config (well, most of
> it) to update_vm_api.. I don't think there is an intentional check
> otherwise for that privilege, so it's likely from something in the
> config..

Yes, didn't think about that. That was exactly it.