From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9692799079
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:18:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7A94131294
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:18:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:18:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 24FAA447A7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:18:08 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <342ebaab-de7b-4aa5-8993-a95f1a04c23e@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:18:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>, Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20230922143658.1639173-1-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
 <20230922143658.1639173-4-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
 <d8b24f6c-db9e-40f9-addb-0b1750714655@proxmox.com>
 <CW1FL070X7RN.1VO551BBW33GD@erna>
From: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CW1FL070X7RN.1VO551BBW33GD@erna>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.087 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-widget-toolkit v1 1/2] fix #4546:
 css: Inform user administrator about user accounts expiring soon
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 10:18:10 -0000



> for the light theme you could simply use the `.warning` class instead
> then you can simply overwrite that with a more specific selector in the
> dark theme again, like we already do in a couple of places.

Thank you. I tried using .warning. Unfortunately the result was yellow
on white background, with very poor readability. Therefore I decided
to use the warning highlighting for columns in both themes.