From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367551FF16B for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:02:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF6613CB4C; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:03:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3349f994-1968-44c3-aa26-cebed994e136@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:02:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Thomas Lamprecht , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20250715120851.2825781-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <175258389459.1952918.8576034924763148913.b4-ty@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <175258389459.1952918.8576034924763148913.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 Average reputation (+2) RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager] ui: guest importer: use 4m efitype for imported vms X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 7/15/25 14:51, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:08:51 +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> If we omit the 'efitype' property, the legacy 2m images get used, so >> explicitly use the 4m variant. >> >> > > Applied, to master and stable-8, thanks! > > We probably should change the deafult here for newly created VMs in the backend > (besides the backup restore path), to ensure we can actually start to sunset > the legacy images in a future major release. yes that makes sense, I can look at it next week > > [1/1] ui: guest importer: use 4m efitype for imported vms > commit: 3397634b5985bda2d2c42006ab325adffc12b566 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel