From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66EA63C5B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:16:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B464619985
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:16:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3CB5A19979
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:16:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0841443B56
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:16:56 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Dominic_J=c3=a4ger?= <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
References: <20201125121519.99697-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <3347b82e-5fa7-e02e-846d-b6f4d8e3749e@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:16:54 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201125121519.99697-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.080 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [merriam-webster.com]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager] ui: storage: pbsedit: Fix
 spelling
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:16:57 -0000

On 25.11.20 13:15, Dominic J=C3=A4ger wrote:
> No e in unusable.
>=20
> to loose means to free from restraint, or to make less tight or strict =
[1].
> to lose means to fail to keep, or to miss something from one's possessi=
on [2].
> So "losing" (instead of "loosing") would be bad.
>=20
> [0] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unusable
> [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/loose
> [2] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lose
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Dominic J=C3=A4ger <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/manager6/storage/PBSEdit.js | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>=20
>

applied, thanks!