From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23DCE6EB67
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:06:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1136011D8F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:05:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 02F0411D80
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C146843896;
 Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <32a78abe-9495-dda0-b587-8bdc104ab83c@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:05:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Claudio Ferreira <filhocf@gmail.com>
References: <CAC=mJXc83k3W8Q_YaWhPND051USzes7DZRG+u0d1GAUTc-FWzQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC=mJXc83k3W8Q_YaWhPND051USzes7DZRG+u0d1GAUTc-FWzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.305 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [po2js.pl]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Error when build i18n file
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:06:07 -0000

Hi,

On 25/08/2021 03:00, Claudio Ferreira wrote:
> $ ./po2js.pl -t pve pt_BR.po > pve-lang-pt_BR.js
> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./po2js.pl
> line 91.
> 
> Unfortunately, google can't help me.
> Some tip?

That's just a warning due to a missing version which we nowadays add to the
beginning of the file to improve marking the cached file stale for a browser.

Nonetheless I pushed out a fallback to "dev-build <date>" to avoid that warning
in the git repo, so either pull or pass a `-v foo` option to "fix" this.

The file should have still been generated though.

cheers,
Thomas