From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15713916AB for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:51:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EA42C17FA3 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:51:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:51:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1C13F45A07 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:51:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3179fba1-e37c-4053-8f66-776fda58c89f@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:51:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Aaron Lauterer References: <20240129144206.1337230-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <20240129144206.1337230-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] ui: storage: zfs: set blocksize placeholder to 16k X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:51:12 -0000 Am 29.01.24 um 15:42 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: > to reflect current ZFS defaults. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer > --- > unless I have missed it, we currently still show the old default as > placeholder > > www/manager6/storage/ZFSPoolEdit.js | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/www/manager6/storage/ZFSPoolEdit.js b/www/manager6/storage/ZFSPoolEdit.js > index b66d131a..a0141ba3 100644 > --- a/www/manager6/storage/ZFSPoolEdit.js > +++ b/www/manager6/storage/ZFSPoolEdit.js > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.storage.ZFSPoolInputPanel', { > { > xtype: 'textfield', > name: 'blocksize', > - emptyText: '8k', > + emptyText: '16k', > fieldLabel: gettext('Block Size'), > allowBlank: true, > }, Well, both values are (potentially) wrong, because it depends on the setting the pool was created with. So maybe "use setting from zpool" or similar? Orthogonal to the patch, but the option also misses proper validation in frontend and backend.