From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E37F81FF2AB for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:48:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8E0E51DDA6; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:49:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <30768a19-ddc4-49dc-b22d-1b47e5cceea8@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:49:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: Content-Language: en-US From: Mira Limbeck In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.317 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] cloudinit: RFC proposal for unwanted and unexpected regeneration of instance-id X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Hi Matias, Thank you for providing this detailed description of the issue! We have an open issue in our bug tracker [0]. If it's alright with you I'd add your text as-is to the bug tracker as a comment for additional information/reasoning on why that change would be needed. Feel free to add yourself to the CC list if you want to be notified on updates. > I am far away from being a Perl developer, but I can put my best > effort during my spare time. > Anyway I would like to know what you think since what I am proposing > changes the current behaviour of PVE cloudinit, maybe these changes > could be part of PVE 9? I already started working on an implementation for a fixed instance-id. I can't give an ETA when the first draft will be sent to the pve-devel list though. [0] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel