From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BADD70ED7 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 98FEF22498 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 27DC52248D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E6AAE43C5E; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <302f24e2-ca2e-01ec-db68-b7d0ceff8021@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, aderumier@odiso.com References: <20220622115206.3295425-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <20220622115206.3295425-11-aderumier@odiso.com> From: Fabian Ebner In-Reply-To: <20220622115206.3295425-11-aderumier@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.204 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v7 qemu-server 10/10] debian : control : add a break on pve-manager <= 7.2.4 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:22:24 -0000 Am 22.06.22 um 13:52 schrieb Alexandre Derumier: > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier > --- > debian/control | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index af258db..eff8165 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -54,6 +54,6 @@ Depends: dbus, > ${perl:Depends}, > ${shlibs:Depends}, > Recommends: proxmox-backup-file-restore (>= 2.1.9-2) > -Breaks: pve-ha-manager (<= 3.0-4), pve-manager (<= 6.0-13) > +Breaks: pve-ha-manager (<= 3.0-4), pve-manager (<= 7.2-4) Is there any special reason for this? What exactly breaks? What's important is that new pve-manager on the target (which is what the migration patch tests for - needs to be adapted to the proper version when applying of course) implies new qemu-server on the target (so it can parse the new section correctly). And that is done via a normal dependency bump pve-manger -> qemu-server. > Description: Qemu Server Tools > This package contains the Qemu Server tools used by Proxmox VE