From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533EE1FF187 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:41:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC773366BA; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:42:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <2fe4bc24-5b6c-470e-9af2-f98c520b14b9@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:42:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Aaron Lauterer References: <20250726010626.1496866-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20250726010626.1496866-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753713721340 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH many v4 00/31] Expand and migrate RRD data and add/change summary graphs X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 26.07.25 um 03:06 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: > KNOWN ISSUES: > * on a live system, renaming the source RRD files to FILE.old doesn't seem to > work as expected and besides the renamed ones, new ones without the .old prefix > show up again. I suspect some interaction with rrdached and/or pmxcfs receiving > new data. Good that we did the rename on migration, as otherwise this might have gone unnoticed. The cleanest and simplest solution here might be to trigger the migration only on boot, i.e. before rrdcached/pve-cluster starts up and can do any RRD related stuff. While I'm not a huge fan of doing such migrations, it is node local and only affects metrics and the old data is still there in the renamed files, so no high fallout risk. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel