From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A864C8B895
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:39:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 979C32751B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:38:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:38:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 82D1B43503
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:38:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <2f2e4bd9-a0ab-7647-39e2-62aa172afdf3@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:38:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:104.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/104.0
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
References: <20220824122430.200797-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220824122430.200797-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [firewall.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH firewall] fix invalid vmfw config being
 interpreted as enabled
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:39:19 -0000

Am 24/08/2022 um 14:24 schrieb Mira Limbeck:
> MAC filter was enabled as long as the VM firewall config existed even
> with an invalid config.
> 
> With this change the check now matches the one for CTs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/Firewall.pm | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!