From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 741F7968A4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:48:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 522121818E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:47:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:47:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5648B4558A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:47:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <2dc344e6-2ec4-407a-b627-2ea83ae48005@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:47:52 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
References: <20240416092717.60511-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240416092717.60511-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v3 container] fix invalid device
 passthrough being added to config
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:48:24 -0000

Am 16.04.24 um 11:27 schrieb Filip Schauer:
> Fix a bug that allows a device passthrough entry to be added to the
> config despite the device path not pointing to a device. Previously,
> adding an invalid device passthrough entry would throw an error, but the
> entry would still be added to the config. This is fixed by moving the
> respective checks from update_lxc_config to update_pct_config, which is
> run before the entry is written to the config file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>

(...)

> diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
> index 5ac1446..408140f 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
> @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ package PVE::LXC::Config;
>  use strict;
>  use warnings;
>  
> -use Fcntl qw(O_RDONLY);
> +use Errno qw(ENOENT);
> +use Fcntl qw(O_RDONLY :mode);
>  
>  use PVE::AbstractConfig;
>  use PVE::Cluster qw(cfs_register_file);

I dropped the above hunk, because it's a left-over from a previous
version AFAICT.

> @@ -1193,6 +1194,14 @@ sub update_pct_config {
>  		die "$opt: MTU size '$mtu' is bigger than bridge MTU '$bridge_mtu'\n"
>  		    if ($mtu > $bridge_mtu);
>  	    }
> +	} elsif ($opt =~ m/^dev(\d+)$/) {
> +	    my $device = $class->parse_device($value);
> +
> +	    die "Path is not defined for passthrough device $opt"
> +		if !defined($device->{path});
> +
> +            # Validate device
> +            PVE::LXC::Tools::get_device_mode_and_rdev($device->{path});
>  	}
>  	$conf->{pending}->{$opt} = $value;
>  	$class->remove_from_pending_delete($conf, $opt);

With that, applied, thanks!